Abstract
Automatic algorithm configuration (AAC) is an increasingly critical factor in the design of efficient metaheuristics. AAC was previously successfully applied to multi-objective local search (MOLS) algorithms using offline tools. However, offline approaches are usually very expensive, draw general recommendations regarding algorithm design for a given set of instances, and does generally not allow per-instance adaptation. Online techniques for automatic algorithm control are usually applied to single-objective evolutionary algorithms. In this work we investigate the impact of including control mechanisms to MOLS algorithms on a classical bi-objective permutation flowshop scheduling problem (PFSP), and demonstrate how even simple control mechanisms can complement traditional offline configuration techniques.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
