Abstract

Managing the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is a widely-recognized land use problem plagued by a fractured geography of land parcels, management jurisdictions, and governance mandates and objectives. People who work in this field have suggested a variety of approaches to managing this interface, from informal governance to contracting to insurance. To date, however, none of these scholars has fully embraced the dynamism, uncertainty, and complexity of the WUI—that is, its status as a complex adaptive system. In focusing almost exclusively on the management of this interface to control wildfire, this scholarship largely ignores the fact that rampant wildfire is itself the product of incursions into important ecosystem services on both sides of the interface. In many cases, people tend to expand out towards the wildland not just for economics (cheaper housing) but also because of a suite of ecosystem services that are readily accessible at the interface, including aesthetics, a cleaner environment, and recreational opportunities. As the wildfire problem amply demonstrates, these settlers then become upset when other aspects of ecosystem function invade their lives, but those invasions include not just wildfire disasters but also more pernicious problems such as diseases, allergens, and wildlife. As such, development at the WUI can create a multifaceted desire to control several “undesirable” aspects of ecosystem function while simultaneously promoting the ecosystem services that residents desire, complicating land use management on both sides of a line that is itself often moving or transforming into a transition or buffer zone. To focus solely on wildfire, in other words, may oversimplify an increasingly complex management problem with significant policy implications. While we cannot and will not attempt to resolve all of these policy issues in this article, we do propose that adaptive management may provide a mechanism for dealing with the complexity of managing changing ecosystem functions and services at the WUI, even when—and perhaps especially because—the private lands and wildlands are usually subject to different land use regimes. We begin with an overview of adaptive management, then discuss the hard but common case of fractured landscape management. We then explore the potential for adaptive management to help negotiate this fractured landscape in a changing world, starting with the classic issue of wildfire management but also suggesting possible expansions.

Highlights

  • Managing the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is a widely-recognized and growing land use problem

  • To better manage the array of problems facing the WUI, we propose that the WUI should be conceptualized as a complex adaptive social-ecological system and that adaptive management for ecosystem services provides a tool that better allows managers on both “sides” of the WUI to deal with systemic risk and the changing landscape in the face of potentially clashing management desires that are both broader than and potentially contributory to wildfire

  • We propose that the WUI is best understood as a complex adaptive social-ecological system that, because of its rapid growth of interface and intermix communities over the past few decades, has in many areas built up immense systemic risk, with wildfire being one type of cascade failure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Managing the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is a widely-recognized and growing land use problem. As houses are built in the WUI, native vegetation is lost and fragmented; landscaping introduces nonnative species and soils are disturbed, causing nonnatives to spread; pets kill large quantities of wildlife; and zoonotic disease, such as Lyme disease, are transmitted (Radeloff et al 2018: 3314) These issues are becoming ever more complex as climate change is altering the baseline—for both the new human residents and the existing ecosystems—of what qualifies as “normal.”. While we cannot and will not attempt to resolve all of these issues in this Article, we do propose that adaptive management may provide a mechanism for dealing with the complexity of managing changing ecosystem functions and services at the WUI, even when—and perhaps especially because—the private lands and developed public lands of urban areas and their nearby wildlands are usually subject to different land use regimes. In Part IV we explore the potential for adaptive management to help negotiate this fractured landscape in a changing world, beginning with the identification of desirable and undesirable ecosystem services

Conceptualizing The WUI as a Complex Adaptive Social-Ecological System
What Are Ecosystem Services?
What Is Adaptive Management?
Land Use Regimes in Collision at the WUI
Land Use Regimes as Adaptive Management Platforms
The Blotchy WUI Land Use Regime Mosaic
Adaptive Management for Ecosystem Services at the WUI
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call