Abstract

BackgroundIn the past two decades, the massive scale-up of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has led to significant reductions in malaria mortality and morbidity. Nonetheless, the malaria burden remains high, and a dozen countries in Africa show a trend of increasing malaria incidence over the past several years. This underscores the need to improve the effectiveness of interventions by optimizing first-line intervention tools and integrating newly approved products into control programs. Because transmission settings and vector ecologies vary from place to place, malaria interventions should be adapted and readapted over time in response to evolving malaria risks. An adaptive approach based on local malaria epidemiology and vector ecology may lead to significant reductions in malaria incidence and transmission risk.Methods/designThis study will use a longitudinal block-cluster sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design with longitudinal outcome measures for a period of 3 years to develop an adaptive intervention for malaria control in western Kenya, the first adaptive trial for malaria control. The primary outcome is clinical malaria incidence rate. This will be a two-stage trial with 36 clusters for the initial trial. At the beginning of stage 1, all clusters will be randomized with equal probability to either LLIN, piperonyl butoxide-treated LLIN (PBO Nets), or LLIN + IRS by block randomization based on their respective malaria risks. Intervention effectiveness will be evaluated with 12 months of follow-up monitoring. At the end of the 12-month follow-up, clusters will be assessed for “response” versus “non-response” to PBO Nets or LLIN + IRS based on the change in clinical malaria incidence rate and a pre-defined threshold value of cost-effectiveness set by the Ministry of Health. At the beginning of stage 2, if an intervention was effective in stage 1, then the intervention will be continued. Non-responders to stage 1 PBO Net treatment will be randomized equally to either PBO Nets + LSM (larval source management) or an intervention determined by an enhanced reinforcement learning method. Similarly, non-responders to stage 1 LLIN + IRS treatment will be randomized equally to either LLIN + IRS + LSM or PBO Nets + IRS. There will be an 18-month evaluation follow-up period for stage 2 interventions. We will monitor indoor and outdoor vector abundance using light traps. Clinical malaria will be monitored through active case surveillance. Cost-effectiveness of the interventions will be assessed using Q-learning.DiscussionThis novel adaptive intervention strategy will optimize existing malaria vector control tools while allowing for the integration of new control products and approaches in the future to find the most cost-effective malaria control strategies in different settings. Given the urgent global need for optimization of malaria control tools, this study can have far-reaching implications for malaria control and elimination.Trial registrationUS National Institutes of Health, study ID NCT04182126. Registered on 26 November 2019.

Highlights

  • In the past two decades, the massive scale-up of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has led to significant reductions in malaria mortality and morbidity

  • The aim of this trial is to design optimal adaptive combinations of vector control interventions to maximize reductions in malaria burden based on local malaria transmission risks, vector ecology, and the available mix of interventions approved by the Ministry of Health (MoH) of Kenya

  • The continuing high malaria burden in many areas of Africa calls for improving the effectiveness of malaria intervention tools [1]

Read more

Summary

Discussion

The continuing high malaria burden in many areas of Africa calls for improving the effectiveness of malaria intervention tools [1]. Due to the heterogeneity and dynamic changes in malaria risk and vector ecology among epidemiological settings, interventions that work in one setting may not work well in others This trial study aims to develop adaptive intervention strategies tailored toward local malaria risks and vector ecologies based on the available set of interventions and cost factors at a point in time. Results from the adaptive intervention provide evidence for effective interventions that are closely tailored to local malaria risks, vector ecologies, and intervention logistics To our knowledge, this is the first cluster-randomized SMART for malaria. Recent developments in predictive data analytic techniques and machine learning provide novel tools to assist in identifying mosquito larval habitats and assessing malaria risks [101, 102] Machine learning, such as reinforcement learning, has been used to identify optimal intervention strategies in clinical treatment studies [80, 86,87,88].

Background
Objective
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call