Abstract

ObjectivesThe change in tumor fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by positron emission tomography (PET) scan after one cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to predict progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Using early FDG-PET response to determine subsequent chemotherapy, we aim to evaluate the role that adaptive chemotherapy regimens have on later CT response, PFS, and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC.Materials and MethodsChemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic NSCLC received carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) on day one and repeated FDG-PET on day 18. PET-responding patients continued CP chemotherapy for a total of four cycles. PET non-responders were switched to alternate docetaxel and gemcitabine (DG) for three additional cycles. The primary outcome was the CT Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.0) response. Secondary endpoints included PFS and OS.Results Forty-six patients initiated treatment with chemotherapy on trial and were evaluable by PET/CT. Of these, 19 (41%) met the FDG-PET criteria for the response after a single cycle of CP. Only one non-responding patient had a CT response. Despite the lack of CT response in the DG arm, no trend for worse PFS or OS was seen between the two arms.ConclusionsThis work demonstrates that changing chemotherapy in the event of non-response by PET did not lead to improved CT RECIST response. However, non-responding patients who switched chemotherapy had similar PFS and OS to those who responded by PET and continued the same regimen.

Highlights

  • In clinical practice, CT is the predominant method for assessing the response to chemotherapy for solid tumors

  • This work demonstrates that changing chemotherapy in the event of non-response by positron emission tomography (PET) did not lead to improved CT response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) response

  • Non-responding patients who switched chemotherapy had similar PFS and overall survival (OS) to those who responded by PET and continued the same regimen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

CT is the predominant method for assessing the response to chemotherapy for solid tumors. This is based on data demonstrating that response by CT is a surrogate marker for improved predict progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL) [1,2,3]. As metabolic changes occur much earlier than tumor shrinkage in response to therapy, fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been investigated to assess the response early during cancer treatment [5,6,7,8]. Serial FDG-PET has been used successfully to predict early response in a variety of tumors including lymphoma [10,11], breast [12,13]. Despite nearly two decades of study in solid tumors, there is insufficient data to support the widespread adoption of this strategy

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call