Abstract

Objective Tracheal sounds were used to detect apnea on various occasions. However, ambient noises can contaminate tracheal sounds which result in poor performance of apnea detection. The objective of this paper was to apply the adaptive filtering (AF) algorithm to improve the quality of tracheal sounds and examine the accuracy of the apnea detection algorithm using tracheal sounds after AF. Method Tracheal sounds were acquired using a primary microphone encased in a plastic bell, and the ambient noises were collected using a reference microphone resting outside the plastic bell in quiet and noisy environments, respectively. Simultaneously, the flow pressure signals and thoracic and abdominal movement were obtained as the standard signals to determine apnea events. Then, the normalized least mean square (NLMS) AF algorithm was applied to the tracheal sounds mixed with noises. Finally, the algorithm of apnea detection was used to the tracheal sounds with AF and the tracheal sounds without AF. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and Cohen's kappa coefficient of apnea detection were calculated. Results Forty-six healthy subjects, aged 18-35 years and with BMI < 21.4, were included in the study. The apnea detection performance using tracheal sounds was as follows: in the quiet environment, the tracheal sounds without AF detected apnea with 97.2% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, 99.8% PPV, 99.4% NPV, 99.5% accuracy, and 0.982 kappa coefficient. The tracheal sounds with AF detected apnea with 98.2% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, 99.4% PPV, 99.6% NPV, 99.6% accuracy, and 0.985 kappa coefficient. While in the noisy environment, the tracheal sounds without AF detected apnea with 81.1% sensitivity, 96.9% specificity, 85.1% PPV, 96% NPV, 94.2% accuracy, and 0.795 kappa coefficient and the tracheal sounds with AF detected apnea with 91.5% sensitivity, 97.4% specificity, 88.4% PPV, 98.2% NPV, 96.4% accuracy, and 0.877 kappa coefficient. Conclusion The performance of apnea detection using tracheal sounds with the NLMS AF algorithm in the noisy environment proved to be accurate and reliable. The AF technology could be applied to the respiratory monitoring using tracheal sounds.

Highlights

  • Tracheal sounds have received much attention in recent years and are often used on respiration-related occasions, such as detecting apnea in sedated volunteers [1] and postanesthesia care unit patients [2], screening obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during wakefulness [3,4,5,6] and detecting OSA during sleep [7,8,9,10]

  • The tracheal sounds with Adaptive filtering (AF) detected apnea with 98.2% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, 99.4% positive predictive value (PPV), 99.6% negative predictive value (NPV), and 99.6% accuracy in the quiet environment

  • The final results showed that in the quiet environment, tracheal sounds without and with AF had similar apnea detection performance, and in the noisy environment, the normalized least mean square (NLMS) AF algorithm significantly improved the performance of apnea detection using tracheal sounds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tracheal sounds have received much attention in recent years and are often used on respiration-related occasions, such as detecting apnea in sedated volunteers [1] and postanesthesia care unit patients [2], screening obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during wakefulness [3,4,5,6] and detecting OSA during sleep [7,8,9,10]. The foremost problem is that talking, machine alarms in the postanesthesia care unit, and ambient noises during wakefulness or sleep are still interferences when tracheal sounds are acquired. Adaptive filtering (AF), which can deal with various kinds of signals in unknown statistical environment or in nonstationary environment, is a promising method of signal processing in adaptive noise cancellation [16]. It is usually better than a fixed filter designed through conventional methods and has been widely used [17], such as removing artifacts in electroencephalography (EEG) [18, 19], electrocardiography (ECG)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call