Abstract

In this paper, we present ground moving target indication (GMTI) signal processing algorithm encompassing clutter suppression, target detection and parameter estimation. One of the most significant yet least publicized is the need of the GMTI mode for a forward-looking airborne radar. The integration of GMTI mode in a forward-looking airborne radar allows reconnaissance and surveillance operations in all weather conditions. In this context, space time adaptive processing (STAP) offers a unique prospect of enabling the GMTI mode in forward looking airborne radar. STAP is a two-dimensional filter designed to suppress platform motion-induced clutter Doppler spread. Interference is characterized by a covariance matrix. In the case of a forward-looking airborne radar, the clutter Doppler is dependent on range. Clutter Doppler dependency on the range renders the training cells heterogeneous. The heterogeneity effects are particularly prominent in the near range bins. Non-homogeneous training cells have a deleterious effect on STAP performance. In this study, we propose an adaptive Doppler compensation to mitigate the degraded STAP performance in the near range bins. The adaptivity feature circumvents the need for the availability of radar parameters in real-time. The real time implementation of STAP is impeded by requirements of a large number of training samples and covariance matrix inversion. Therefore, there is a dire need to devise a framework to detect and estimate target parameters within the STAP. In this regard, we propose an efficient STAP algorithm to detect and estimate target parameters. STAP weights are applied to the input data to obtain a 3D array. The range projection of the 3D array is utilized to detect and estimate the range of the target, while the angle–Doppler projection is used to estimate spatial and temporal parameters of the target. Most of the literature on STAP is geared towards a known covariance matrix. The assumption of a known covariance matrix may degrade STAP performance because of the inherent mismatches between the actual and assumed target steering vectors. In this study, we estimate the covariance matrix based on the synthetic data generated from a model of an airborne phased array radar. The developed STAP algorithms closely mimic a real-time implementation scheme in an airborne radar platform. The results of the proposed algorithm are validated through target parameter estimation and STAP metrics on synthetic data.

Highlights

  • Recent advancements in airborne phased array radars have enabled agile beam steering and high-speed multimode processing

  • In the case of a forward-looking airborne radar, clutter Doppler is dependent on the range and each range bin is associated with a different Doppler frequency [12,13,14]

  • We considered a forward-looking airborne radar with a uniform linear array (ULA), to develop the the clutter model and space time adaptive processing (STAP) algorithms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent advancements in airborne phased array radars have enabled agile beam steering and high-speed multimode processing. One of the simplest approaches to detect a moving target is to incorporate a high pass filter after pulse compression [3] This is a non-adaptive approach in which slow-moving targets are attenuated that appears close to the background clutter. In the case of a forward-looking airborne radar, clutter Doppler is dependent on the range and each range bin is associated with a different Doppler frequency [12,13,14]. The heterogeneous training range bin samples yield an erroneous covariance matrix estimate, which may degrade STAP performance in terms of the increased minimum detectable velocity (MDV) and decreased usable Doppler spread fraction (UDSF). STAP filter aids in slow-moving target detection, yet it offers another perspective to estimate target parameters.

Related Work
Main Contribution of This Paper
Organization of This
Angle Doppler Response
Optimum Processor
Adaptive
Proposed adaptive adaptive Doppler
REVIEW
Simulation Parameters
Range Doppler Map of Raw Data
Extravagant
Estimation of Clutter Doppler Frequency
10. Theoretical
Target Parameter Estimation
STAP Metrics
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call