Abstract
BackgroundMost interventions to improve patient safety (Patient Safety Practices (PSPs)), are introduced without engaging front-line professionals. Administrative staff, managers and sometimes a few professionals, representing only one or two disciplines, decide what to change and how. Consequently, PSPs are not fully adapted to the professionals’ needs or to the local context and as a result, adoption is low. To support adoption, two theoretical concepts, Participatory Design and Experiential Learning were combined in a new model: Adaptive Design. The aim was to explore whether Adaptive Design supports adaptation and adoption of PSPs by engaging all professionals and creating time to (re) design, reflect and learn as a team. The Time Out Procedure (TOP) and Debriefing (plus) for improving patient safety in the operating theatre (OT) was used as PSP.MethodsQualitative exploratory multi-site study using participatory action research as a research design. The implementation process consisted of four phases: 1) start-up: providing information by presentations and team meetings, 2) pilot: testing the prototype with 100 surgical procedures, 3) small scale implementation: with one or two surgical disciplines, 4) implementation hospital-wide: including all surgical disciplines. In iterations, teams (re) designed, tested, evaluated, and if necessary adapted TOPplus. Gradually all professionals were included. Adaptations in content, process and layout of TOPplus were measured following each iteration. Adoption was monitored until final implementation in every hospital’s OT.Results10 Dutch hospitals participated. Adaptations varied per hospital, but all hospitals adapted both procedures. Adaptations concerned the content, process and layout of TOPplus. Both procedures were adopted in all OTs, but user participation and time to include all users varied between hospitals. Ultimately all users were actively involved and TOPplus was implemented in all OTs.ConclusionsEngaging all professionals in a structured bottom-up implementation approach with a focus on learning, improves adaptation and adoption of a PSP. As a result, all 10 participating hospitals implemented TOPplus with all surgical disciplines in all OTs. Adaptive Design gives professionals the opportunity to adapt the PSP to their own needs and their specific local context. All hospitals adapted TOPplus, but without compromising the essential features for its effectiveness.
Highlights
Most interventions to improve patient safety (Patient Safety Practices (PSPs)), are introduced without engaging front-line professionals
We focused on engaging all professionals in the design and implementation process, as at the start of the Time Out Procedure (TOP) plus project professionals were reluctant to involve patients, partly because of the patient’s premedication and their answers not always being reliable
Almost all hospitals adapted Time Out Procedure and Debriefing (TOPplus) at content, process and layout level, but little was changed at the level of criteria
Summary
Most interventions to improve patient safety (Patient Safety Practices (PSPs)), are introduced without engaging front-line professionals. PSPs are not fully adapted to the professionals’ needs or to the local context and as a result, adoption is low. The aim was to explore whether Adaptive Design supports adaptation and adoption of PSPs by engaging all professionals and creating time to (re) design, reflect and learn as a team. Interventions to improve patient safety are complex and hard to implement without the support of front-line healthcare professionals (Pearson et al, 2009). These interventions, called Patient Safety Practices (PSPs) aim to prevent and mitigate unintended consequences of healthcare delivery and improve patient safety [1]. PSPs are not regarded as meaningful, and not at all or only partially adopted as a daily work routine [5, 6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.