Abstract

Abstract The capacity of a nation to address the hydrological impacts of climate change depends on the institutions through which water is governed. Inter-institutional networks that enable institutions to adapt and the factors that hinder smooth coordination are poorly understood. Using water governance in India as an example of a complex top-down bureaucratic system that requires effective networks between all key institutions, this research unravels the barriers to adaptation by combining quantitative internet data mining and qualitative analysis of interviews with representatives from twenty-six key institutions operating at the national level. Institutions' online presence shows a disconnect in the institutional discourse between climate change and water with institutions such as the Ministries of Water Resources, Earth Sciences and Agriculture, indicating a lesser involvement compared to institutions such as the Ministries of Finance, External Affairs, Planning Commission. The online documents also indicate a more centralised inter-institutional network, emanating from or pointing to a few key institutions including the Planning Commission and Ministry of Environment and Forests. However, the interviews suggest more complex relational dynamics between institutions and also demonstrate a gap between the aspirational ideals of the National Water Mission under the National Action Plan on Climate Change and the realities of climate change adaptation. This arises from institutional barriers, including lengthy bureaucratic processes and systemic failures, that hinder effective inter-institutional networks to facilitate adaptation. The study provides new understanding of the involvement and barriers of complex multi-layered institutions in climate change adaptation.

Highlights

  • Climate change is likely to affect the spatio-temporal distribution, availability and demand for water (IPCC, 2014) through changing precipitation (Chou et al, 2013) and evapotranspiration patterns, glacier melt rates (Jiménez Cisneros et al, 2014) and saline intrusion of coastal aquifers (IPCC, 2014)

  • 9 institutions were identified as most involved/interested in the climate change and water discourse – Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Environment and Forests [renamed as Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change on 26th May 2014], Ministry of Science and Technology, Planning Commission [“Planning Commission” is used here as the data was collected before it was replaced by NITI Ayog (National Institution for Transforming India), declared on 15th August 2014], Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Ministry of Railways, Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Earth Sciences and the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy

  • This paper broadens the understanding of complex, multi-layered inter-relationships between institutions involved in climate change adaptation, depicted by India, through combining the quantitative online data-mining analysis of social networks with qualitative evaluation of multi-stakeholder involvement gained through in-depth interviews with representatives from key institutions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change is likely to affect the spatio-temporal distribution, availability and demand for water (IPCC, 2014) through changing precipitation (Chou et al, 2013) and evapotranspiration patterns, glacier melt rates (Jiménez Cisneros et al, 2014) and saline intrusion of coastal aquifers (IPCC, 2014). Water institutions – government ministries, departments and agencies, non-governmental and developmental agencies, and research and academic institutions – need the ability to anticipate and alleviate these potential threats in order to minimise vulnerability and damages (Bohensky et al, 2010; Matthews and Sydneysmith, 2010), while taking advantage of the opportunities afforded by adaptation (IPCC, 2007; Vincent, 2007) and from complementing ongoing mitigation efforts (IPCC, 2014; Simonet and Fatorić, 2015) Informal institutions, such as the ways in which societies interact, play an important role in climate change adaptation (Berman et al, 2012), formal institutional bodies( government institutions which have their mandate enforced by legislation) play a major role in the allocation of resources, delineating responsibilities between actors, facilitating actions and mediating trade-offs (Cook et al, 2010). There is a need to understand the factors and circumstances that strengthen the ties and cooperation between various institutions and sectors for information diffusion and knowledge exchange (Popp et al, 2013) that enhance adaptive capacity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call