Abstract

Most of the methods developed for managing data-limited stocks have been designed for long-lived species and result in a poor performance when applied to short-lived fish due to their high interannual variability of stock size (IAV). We evaluate the performance of several catch rules in managing two typical short-lived fish (anchovy-like: characterized by high natural mortality, and hence, IAV, and full maturity at age 1; and sprat/sardine-like: with medium natural mortality and IAV, being fully mature at age 2). We followed the management strategy evaluation approach implemented in FLBEIA software to test several model-free harvest control rules, where the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is yearly modified according to the recent trends in an abundance index (n-over-m rules: means of the most recent n values over the precedent m ones). The performance of these rules was assessed across a range of settings, such as time-lags between the index availability and management implementation, and alternative restrictions on TACs’ interannual variability (the uncertainty caps, UC). Moreover, we evaluated the sensitivity of the rule performance to the operating model assumptions (stock type, productivity, recruitment variability and initial depletion level) and to the observation error of the index. In general, the shorter the lag between observations, advice and management, the bigger the catches and the smaller the biological risks. For in-year management, 1-over-m rules are reactive enough to stock fluctuations as to gradually reduce risks. The 1-over-2 rule with symmetric 80% UCs reduces catches and risks toward precautionary levels in about 10 years, faster than if applied unconstrained (i.e., without UC), whilst the ICES default 2-over-3 rule with symmetric 20% UC is not precautionary. We prove that unconstrained rules gradually reduce the fishing opportunities, with amplified effects with increasing IAV. This property explains the stronger reductions of catches and risks achieved for the anchovy compared to the sprat/sardine-like stocks for any rule and the balance between catches and risks as the index CV increases. However, to avoid unnecessary long-term losses of catches from such reduction properties, it is suggested that the rules should be applied provisionally until a better assessment and management system is set up.

Highlights

  • The majority of the stocks exploited worldwide are from fisheries that lack formal stock assessments (Beddington et al, 2007; Costello et al, 2012; Ricard et al, 2012)

  • ICES provides advice for stocks in categories 1 and 2 based on the ICES maximum sustainable yield (MSY) advice rule that aims at maximizing the average long-term yield while maintaining productive fish stocks, whereas for stocks in categories 3–6 the advice is based on empirical harvest control rules that aim at maintaining the stocks within safe biological limits in accordance with the precautionary approach

  • 1-over-2 rule unconstrained by any uncertainty cap or the 1-over-2 rule including a biomass safeguard with 80% lower and 400% upper uncertainty caps accommodated better to the highly fluctuating nature of the short-lived stocks, resulting in precautionary risk levels in the long term

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of the stocks exploited worldwide are from fisheries that lack formal stock assessments (Beddington et al, 2007; Costello et al, 2012; Ricard et al, 2012). The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), that provides management advice for many European fisheries, started to develop its tier system, the so-called datalimited framework, in 2012 (ICES, 2012a). Since this framework has evolved over time through several expert working groups that have validated and refined many of the methods proposed (ICES, 2012b, 2020c). ICES provides advice for stocks in categories 1 and 2 based on the ICES maximum sustainable yield (MSY) advice rule that aims at maximizing the average long-term yield while maintaining productive fish stocks, whereas for stocks in categories 3–6 the advice is based on empirical harvest control rules that aim at maintaining the stocks within safe biological limits in accordance with the precautionary approach. To account for the inherent uncertainty of the index, the interannual change in the catch advice is capped by a maximum change limit called uncertainty cap (UC)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.