Abstract

The System Operator (SO), also known as Nine Boxes or Multiscreen, is classically used for analysing the undesired situation according to different perspectives. However, its logic can be suitably exploited also for other kinds of tasks. In such a context, this paper shows an alternative application of the SO. In particular, the new proposed SO approach allows us to formulate alternative problems, i.e., different from the central one, although referring to the same problem-solving task. By applying the proposed procedure to a real case study, this paper shows that the tool can be used for problem analysis and formulation purposes, aimed at better clarifying the problem-solving task. The case study concerns a preliminary set of experiments performed to evaluate the possibility of obtaining angular shapes by bending tiles made by a specific compostable composite material. The suggestions obtained using the proposed SO approach allowed us to find potentially valid solutions, thus paving the way for further validation tests. In particular, tests are still needed to validate the actual potentialities of the proposed SO. Additionally, further and more comprehensive tests are required to validate the solutions inferred in this study concerning the compostable tiles.

Highlights

  • TRIZ is nowadays one of the most acknowledged bases of knowledge for problem solving, mentioned in several literature contributions

  • By applying the proposed procedure to a real case study, this paper shows that the tool can be used for problem analysis and formulation purposes, aimed at better clarifying the problem-solving task

  • The work described in this paper aims at presenting an alternative use of the TRIZ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

TRIZ is nowadays one of the most acknowledged bases of knowledge for problem solving, mentioned in several literature contributions. TRIZ offers a set of tools to be conveniently selected according to specific needs [1]. It was formerly developed by Genrich Altshuller [2], whose first publication (On the Psychology of Inventive Creativity [3]) dates back to 1956 and argues about how to solve thousands of different technical contradictions by means of a limited number of ‘inventive principles’. It is worth noticing that several classical TRIZ developments and/or alternatives arose during the years (e.g., SIT [4], USIT [5], CROST [6], etc.) Providing descriptions of these contributions falls out of the scope of this paper

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.