Abstract

BackgroundRecent adaptations of the spatial scan approach to detecting disease clusters have addressed the problem of finding clusters that occur in non-compact and non-circular shapes – such as along roads or river networks. Some of these approaches may have difficulty defining cluster boundaries precisely, and tend to over-fit data with very irregular (and implausible) clusters shapes.Results & DiscussionWe describe two simple adaptations to these approaches that can be used to improve the effectiveness of irregular disease cluster detection. The first adaptation penalizes very irregular cluster shapes based on a measure of connectivity (non-connectivity penalty). The second adaptation prevents searches from combining smaller clusters into large super-clusters (depth limit). We conduct experiments with simulated data in order to observe the performance of these adaptations on a number of synthetic cluster shapes.ConclusionOur results suggest that the combination of these two adaptations may increase the ability of a cluster detection method to find irregular shapes without affecting its ability to find more regular (i.e., compact) shapes. The depth limit in particular is effective when it is deemed important to distinguish nearby clusters from each other. We suggest that these adaptations of adjacency-constrained spatial scans are particularly well suited to chronic disease and injury surveillance.

Highlights

  • Recent adaptations of the spatial scan approach to detecting disease clusters have addressed the problem of finding clusters that occur in non-compact and non-circular shapes – such as along roads or river networks

  • Our results suggest that the combination of these two adaptations may increase the ability of a cluster detection method to find irregular shapes without affecting its ability to find more regular shapes

  • The depth limit in particular is effective when it is deemed important to distinguish nearby clusters from each other. We suggest that these adaptations of adjacencyconstrained spatial scans are well suited to chronic disease and injury surveillance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent adaptations of the spatial scan approach to detecting disease clusters have addressed the problem of finding clusters that occur in non-compact and non-circular shapes – such as along roads or river networks. It is difficult to formulate a single discrete null hypothesis about whether or not a cluster at a particular location is noteworthy unless we know the location of that cluster ahead of time Since this is often the purpose of a cluster detection exercise, we are caught in a 'catch-22' – wanting to decide about the anomalousness of something that we have yet to find. One way this has been avoided is by stepping out of the traditional hypothesis testing paradigm – for example, by using the exploratory disease cluster detection tools [1,2]. These alternatives follow an inductive scientific model, and are well suited to exploring various patterns of events in space without a single explicit hypothesis test

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.