Abstract

In healthy volunteers, we recorded stabilograms and studied postural responses evoked by galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth (binaurally applied 1-mA current, 4 sec) with the subjects' eyes open and closed and under conditions of reversed visual perception. Horizontal reversal of the visual space was provided by using spectacles with the Dove's prisms. In series consisting of 10 sequential tests with eyes open, we observed a gradual drop in the response amplitude, while there were practically no changes in the maximum velocity of the displacement. Postural responses with eyes closed were considerably greater than those with eyes open, but their amplitude and velocity demonstrated no changes with sequential tests. Under conditions of reversal of the visual perception, both the amplitude and maximum velocity of the postural responses decreased with successive testing. Under the above conditions, at the beginning of a test series responses to vestibular stimulation were greater than those with eyes closed, but in repeated tests they decreased and attained the same magnitude as in the tests with eyes closed. Therefore, the effect of short-term adaptation to visual reversal on the system controlling vertical posture resulted in simple rejection of the information coming via the visual input. In another experimental mode, we studied the adaptation effects at longer (3 h long) visual reversal. Postural responses to galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth (monaurally applied, 2-mA current, 4 sec) were tested with 1-h-long intervals; tests with visual reversal and with eyes closed were made in a random order with each other. A 3-h-long interval with the prismatic spectacles on did not modify the amplitude and velocity of the vestibular postural responses when the tests were made with the eyes closed. When the tests were performed with the eyes open, but in the inverting spectacles, postural responses significantly decreased (by about 50-60%) to the 2nd and 3rd h of the experiment. Such selective suppression of the vestibular input under conditions of visual reversal can be interpreted as a result of adaptational transformation of the visual-vestibular relation directed toward minimization of the visual-vestibular conflict.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call