Abstract

Experimental evolution (EE) is a powerful tool for addressing how environmental factors influence life‐history evolution. While in nature different selection pressures experienced across the lifespan shape life histories, EE studies typically apply selection pressures one at a time. Here, we assess the consequences of adaptation to three different developmental diets in combination with classical selection for early or late reproduction in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. We find that the response to each selection pressure is similar to that observed when they are applied independently, but the overall magnitude of the response depends on the selection regime experienced in the other life stage. For example, adaptation to increased age at reproduction increased lifespan across all diets; however, the extent of the increase was dependent on the dietary selection regime. Similarly, adaptation to a lower calorie developmental diet led to faster development and decreased adult weight, but the magnitude of the response was dependent on the age‐at‐reproduction selection regime. Given that multiple selection pressures are prevalent in nature, our findings suggest that trade‐offs should be considered not only among traits within an organism, but also among adaptive responses to different—sometimes conflicting—selection pressures, including across life stages.

Highlights

  • One of the central tenets of life-­history evolution is that individuals cannot simultaneously optimize all fitness-­related traits due to constraints (Roff, 1992, 2001; Stearns, 1992)

  • Our results suggests that adaptation during one life stage may be contingent on the selection pressures experienced in other stages and that adaptation to two different selection pressures can lead to different life-­history strategies to those found when adapting to only one selection pressure at a time

  • The dependence of lifespan extension on evolutionary developmental diet suggests that developmental acquisition can be an important factor influencing longevity

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

One of the central tenets of life-­history evolution is that individuals cannot simultaneously optimize all fitness-­related traits due to constraints (Roff, 1992, 2001; Stearns, 1992). Adaptation to a poor quality diet generally selects for faster development coupled with smaller adult size and decreased fecundity (Bochdanovits & Jong, 2003; Kolss et al, 2009), whereas longer lifespan (the typical response to selection on increased age at reproduction) is generally correlated with longer developmental time and larger size (Lints, 1978; Economos, 1980; Promislow, 1993; Khazaeli, Van Voorhies, & Curtsinger, 2005, but see Zwaan, Bijlsma, & Hoekstra, 1991). We assess the evolutionary responses of several life-­history traits These include larval survival, developmental time and adult weight, all of which have previously been found to evolve in response to larval acquisition (e.g., Bochdanovits & Jong, 2003; Kolss et al, 2009), as well as adult lifespan and fecundity, the two traits that commonly trade off in response to selection on age at reproduction (Luckinbill et al, 1984; Rose, 1984). We assay traits over multiple generations and in multiple larval dietary environments to gain insight into the temporal dynamics of evolution, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity

| Design of the experimental evolution experiment
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call