Abstract

To investigate the relationship between adaptation time and the parameters of electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in healthy subjects. Forty-six eyes of 23 healthy women (mean age 21.7years) were enrolled. ERG and pupillography were tested in each of the right and left 23 eyes, respectively. ERG with a skin electrode was used to determine amplitude and implicit time by the records of rod-, flash-, cone-, and flicker-responses with white light (0.01-30cds/m2). Infrared pupillography was used to record the pupillary light reflex to 1-s stimulation of red light (100cd/m2). Cone- and flicker- (rod-, flash- and pupil) responses were recorded after light (dark) adaptation at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20min. Amplitude (µV) was significantly different between 1min and ≥ 5 or ≥ 10min after adaptation in b-wave of cone- or rod-response, respectively. Implicit time (ms) differed significantly between 1min and ≥ 5min after adaptation with b-wave of cone- and rod-response. There were significant differences between 1min and ≥ 10 or ≥ 5min after dark adaptation in parameter of minimum pupil diameter (mm) or constriction rate (%), respectively. Cone-driven ERG can be recorded, even in 5min of light adaptation time without any special light condition, whereas rod-driven ERG and pupillary response results can be obtained in 10min or longer of dark adaptation time in complete darkness.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.