Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground. Radiotherapy of lung cancer patients is subject to uncertainties related to heterogeneities, anatomical changes and breathing motion. Use of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) can reduce the treated volume, potentially enabling dose-escalated (DE) treatments. This study was designed to investigate the need for adaptation due to anatomical changes, for both standard (ST) and DE plans in free-breathing (FB) and DIBH.Material and methods. The effect of tumor shrinkage (TS), pleural effusion (PE) and atelectasis was investigated for patients and for a CIRS thorax phantom. Sixteen patients were computed tomography (CT) imaged both in FB and DIBH. Anatomical changes were simulated by CT information editing and re-calculations, of both ST and DE plans, in the treatment planning system. PE was systematically simulated by adding fluid in the dorsal region of the lung and TS by reduction of the tumor volume.Results. Phantom simulations resulted in maximum deviations in mean dose to the GTV-T (<D>GTV-T) of −1% for 3 cm PE and centrally located tumor, and + 3% for TS from 5 cm to 1 cm diameter for an anterior tumor location. For the majority of the patients, simulated PE resulted in a decreasing <D>GTV-T with increasing amount of fluid and increasing <D>GTV-T for decreasing tumor volume. Maximum change in <D>GTV-T of -3% (3 cm PE in FB for both ST and DE plans) and + 10% (2 cm TS in FB for DE plan) was observed. Large atelectasis reduction increased the <D>GTV-T with 2% for FB and had no effect for DIBH.Conclusion. Phantom simulations provided potential adaptation action levels for PE and TS. For the more complex patient geometry, individual assessment of the dosimetric impact is recommended for both ST and DE plans in DIBH as well as in FB. However, DIBH was found to be superior over FB for DE plans, regarding robustness of <D>GTV-T to TS.
Highlights
Radiotherapy of lung cancer patients is subject to uncertainties related to heterogeneities, anatomical changes and breathing motion
Phantom simulations resulted in a reduction of the mean dose to the GTV-T (ϽDϾGTV-T) with increasing amount of pleural effusion (PE) for all tumor positions (Figure 2), with a maximum decrease of 1.3% for the centrally located tumor
A posteriorly positioned tumor will in some cases get surrounded by fluid during PE, resulting in a build-up effect that is greater than the attenuating effect
Summary
Radiotherapy of lung cancer patients is subject to uncertainties related to heterogeneities, anatomical changes and breathing motion. This study was designed to investigate the need for adaptation due to anatomical changes, for both standard (ST) and DE plans in free-breathing (FB) and DIBH. The effect of tumor shrinkage (TS), pleural effusion (PE) and atelectasis was investigated for patients and for a CIRS thorax phantom. PE was systematically simulated by adding fluid in the dorsal region of the lung and TS by reduction of the tumor volume. Phantom simulations resulted in maximum deviations in mean dose to the GTV-T (ϽDϾGTV-T) of Ϫ1% for 3 cm PE and centrally located tumor, and ϩ 3% for TS from 5 cm to 1 cm diameter for an anterior tumor location. For the majority of the patients, simulated PE resulted in a decreasing ϽDϾGTV-T with increasing amount of fluid and increasing ϽDϾGTV-T for decreasing tumor volume. DIBH was found to be superior over FB for DE plans, regarding robustness of ϽDϾGTV-T to TS
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
