Abstract

This article highlights how fieldwork scholars of adaptation in resource-dependent communities may enhance our capacity to craft comparative lessons and contribute an empirical foundation to theories and policy initiatives for adaptation. We briefly synthesize how scholars conducting field research on adaptation in common pool resource communities have measured and assessed adaptation, discuss some of the points of contention in the adaptation literature and in the field, and indicate ways in which adaptation could be further clarified in the field. Specifically, we identify a need for greater clarity in how field researchers define adaptation, examine the relationship between disturbance and adaptive response, and evaluate the outcomes of adaptation processes. Our review of the literature reiterates the challenges in comparing case studies and suggests means by which greater conceptual and methodological clarity may provide a much-needed empirical foundation to our understanding of adaptation processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.