Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Mandarin (simplified) Chinese version of the Voice Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire (MC-VFHQ). A total of 358 participants were included from June 2020 to April 2021: 243 patients with voice disorders (patient group) and 115 vocally healthy individuals (control group). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, clinical, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed, and the cutoff point was determined. The internal consistency of the MC-VFHQ was high, and the internal consistency assessed with Cronbach α coefficients for the subscale scores ranged from 0.821 to 0.983; the values for the total score were 0.952 and 0.943 in the patient and control group, respectively. Test-retest reliability was high for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.924) and the subscales (ICCs=0.969, 0.939, 0.922). The patient group had significantly higher total score, subscale scores, and item scores than the control group (P < 0.001). The cutoff point for screening between the two groups was 63.5, with a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 84.30%. The MC-VFHQ is a valid and reliable tool for identifying individuals with probable vocal fatigue. It has good reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity in the Mandarin Chinese-speaking population.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call