Acute Type I aortic dissection: a propensity-matched comparison of elephant trunk and arch debranching repairs.

Abstract

Our goal was to compare the performance of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) and the hybrid aortic arch debranching procedures for acute Type I aortic dissection. From January 2013 to December 2015, 168 patients with Type I aortic disease underwent ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement with FET implantation (the FET group, n = 132) or arch debranching with 1-stage aortic arch exclusion using an endovascular stent in a retrograde manner (the debranching group, n = 36). A propensity score-matched subgroup of 26 pairs was identified. Perioperative data and mid-term follow-up results were assessed. In the FET and the debranching groups, the 30-day mortality rates were 14.4% and 5.6% (P = 0.254) and the incidence of stroke was 5.3% and 5.6% (P > 0.999). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shortened, and the circulatory arrest was exempted in the debranching group. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was identified as a predictor for 30-day mortality (P = 0.027, odds ratio 1.01). Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (P = 0.016, odds ratio 3.51). Surgical modality did not significantly affect early outcomes. The 3-year survival rate was 76.1% (95% confidence interval, 63.0-81.9%) in the FET group and 82.5% (95% confidence interval, 65.2-91.8%) in the debranching group (P = 0.330). The hybrid aortic arch procedure without circulatory arrest can be safely performed on patients with acute Type I aortic dissection. Irrespective of cost-effectiveness, arch debranching was a promising alternative for patients who were unfit for the FET procedure.