Abstract

Reciprocity motivates to reward those who are kind (= positive reciprocity) and to punish those who are unkind (= negative reciprocity). The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) modulates human behavior in numerous social situations, such as retaliation in response to perceived unfairness. In a placebo-controlled study, we used acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) to investigate the influence of available serotonin on choice behavior and reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove game. This game illustrates a conflict situation and incorporates two potential strategies: the cooperative Dove strategy and the uncooperative, more aggressive Hawk strategy. After strategic choices, we elicited the subjects’ expectations (= beliefs) regarding the opponent’s choices and controlled for risk preferences and current mood. We defined strategy choices as negative reciprocity when the participants opted for Hawk in response to an expected Hawk. We hypothesized that the ATD-induced reduction of 5-HT availability would increase participants’ preferences for negative reciprocity. Generalized estimating equations reveal no significant main effect of ATD on assessed belief, mood, or risk attitude. But assessment of ATD’s marginal effects over beliefs suggests that ATD significantly increases the tendency for negative reciprocity, whereas positive reciprocity (Dove in response to an expected Dove) is unaffected. We could therefore demonstrate that 5-HT availability mediates (negative) reciprocal behavior in social decision-making.

Highlights

  • People’s decisions often involve a conflict between self-interest and the interests of others

  • Comparing the acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) group with the placebo group, we found no significant differences in age (MATD = 24.56, SDATD = .54 vs. Mplacebo = 25.04, SDplacebo = .60, t(47) = .55, p = .554), height (MATD = 181.96, SDATD = 1.28 vs. Mplacebo = 184.79, SDplacebo = 1.60, t(47) = 1.39, p = .171), weight (MATD = 81.00, SDATD = 2.31 vs. Mplacebo = 85.33, SDplacebo = 2.50, t(47) = 1.42, p = .162), and monthly income (MATD = 603.75, SDATD = 205.70 vs. Mplacebo = 674.58, SDplacebo = 266.88, t(47) = 1.03, p = .308)

  • The results show that the effect of ATD on the choice likelihood of a Hawk strategy is only significant at the 10% level (z = 1.65, p = .099)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People’s decisions often involve a conflict between self-interest and the interests of others In these social dilemmas, traditional economic models often assume that people act purely selfishly, meaning that they maximize their own material or monetary outcomes regardless of the consequences for others [1, 2]. There is ample evidence that contradicts these assumptions and that shows that people do care about their own outcomes, and those of others [3,4,5]. Likewise, people shape their decisions according to others’ behavior and/or the perceived intentions behind it, which can lead to reciprocal behavior [6, 7].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call