Acute renal artery occlusion: When is revascularization justified?

Abstract

Acute renal artery occlusion is an infrequently encountered entity, with a paucity of literature on which to form clinical decisions. During a 20-year period 35 patients were treated for acute renal artery occlusion as a result of embolism (13 patients), thrombosis of a stenosed vessel (16 patients), or trauma (six patients). Patients were treated operatively in 16 cases and nonoperatively in 19 cases. In patients with embolic occlusion, embolectomy was successful in the relief of hypertension but was ineffective in the restoration of renal function. In patients with thrombotic occlusion, thrombectomy and aortorenal bypass were successful in both the reduction of blood pressure and the retrieval of renal function. In this group, salvage was dependent on the presence of a reconstituted distal renal artery, irrespective of the operative delay. In patients with traumatic renal artery occlusion, return of renal function did not occur, despite reperfusion as early as 6 hours after injury. These data suggest that the period in which function of embolized or traumatized kidneys may be preserved has usually passed by the time the diagnosis of renal artery occlusion has been made. By contrast, operative therapy of thrombotic occlusion frequently results in return of renal function, irrespective of the delay in treatment.