Abstract

Efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide (2 mg/kg body weight in 10 minutes), verapamil (10 mg in 1 minute), and propafenone (2 mg/kg body weight in 10 minutes) were investigated in 90 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). In the first 40 patients, flecainide and verapamil were evaluated; in the second 50 patients, flecainide and propafenone were compared, both in a single-blind randomized study design. The primary end point was sinus rhythm occurring within 1 hour after start of infusion. Sinus rhythm was attained in 32 of 37 patients (86%) with AF treated with flecainide and in 11 of 20 patients (55%) with AF treated with propafenone. In recent onset AF (≤24 hours) conversion rates were 24 of 25 patients (96%) in the flecainide group and 8 of 14 patients (57%) in the propafenone group (p < 0.05). Conversion of AFL occurred in only 1 of 8 patients (13%) in the flecainide-treated patients and in 2 of 5 patients (40%) treated with propafenone (difference not significant). Verapamil was almost ineffective, since only 1 of 20 patients (5%) responded within 1 hour. Time to conversion was 21 ± 17 minutes in the flecainide group and 16 ± 10 minutes in the propafenone group. QRS widening occurred in flecainide-treated patients (83 ± 15 to 99 ± 20 msec; p < 0.001), but not after propafenone (83 ± 11 to 86 ± 12 msec). Significantly higher plasma levels were found in patients with conversion within 1 hour using propafenone. Adverse reactions were more frequent in the flecainide group (31%) compared with the propafenone group (8%; p < 0.01). Conversion by class IC drugs may be preferable to direct current cardioversion or oral quinidine, usually requiring hospitalization.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call