Acute optic neuritis: What do complementary tests add to diagnosis?

Abstract

IntroductionOptic neuritis (ON) is the inflammation of the optic nerve due in many cases, to a pathological immune response. Since its symptoms can be subtle, diagnosis is sometimes challenging. The value of complementary tests for diagnosis and prognosis of ON was demonstrated in retrospective analysis, but their utility in the acute period of ON has been scarcely studied. The aim of this study is to determine the usefulness of clinical assessment, optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual evoked potentials (VEP) and orbit magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for making diagnosis and prognosis of acute ON (AON). Materials and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted including patients with ON within 90 days of symptom onset. A complete neuro-ophthalmological evaluation, OCT, VEP and MRI were carried out, determining in each case its sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the diagnosis of ON and the assessment of its severity. Results75 eyes of 34 patients with ON were included. Regarding diagnosis, low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) displayed the highest sensitivity (100%), being superior than the sensitivity of all complementary tools, always below 80%. Orbit MRI abnormal findings has a Specificity of 100% to confirm diagnosis. Regarding severity assessment and prognosis, Ganglion cell +inner plexiform layer (GCIP) thickness, but not retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), correlates significantly with patients’ visual acuity (VA) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, both P100latency and VEP's amplitude showed to be significantly associated with VA (p < 0.05) in the acute period. The combination of two predictors (measurement of RNFL and GCIP) are capable of explaining 60% of the variation of the patient's visual acuity, with statistical significance (p = 0.02) ConclusionsIn depth neuro-ophthalmological assessment during the acute phase of ON, including contrast sensitivity measurement, proved to be superior to complementary tests for diagnosis, surpassing the performance of OCT and VEP. However, these tools can add to prognosis, as GCIP thickness and VEP's amplitude correlate with disease severity and its findings could encourage prompt aggressive treatments in AON.