Acute management--how should we intervene?

Abstract

A crucial question in the acute management of the patient with unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD) is whether to carry out early intervention, performing angiography soon after presentation and following this with revascularization where appropriate, or whether to follow a noninvasive medical strategy as far as possible unless symptoms necessitate intervention. The body of literature addressing this question is sparse, but the recent Fast Revascularization during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC II) study has provided new insights into the problem. Using a factorial design to randomize patients to invasive or noninvasive management strategies, and to short- or long-term treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin sodium (Fragmin), it was shown in FRISC II that early invasive treatment (within 7 days), when combined with optimal medical pretreatment with dalteparin sodium, aspirin, and appropriate antianginal medication, is associated with improved clinical outcomes, relative to a "watchful waiting" approach based on noninvasive therapy. Thus, an early invasive approach following aggressive medical pretreatment should be the preferred strategy for patients with UCAD who present with signs of ischemia on the electrocardiogram or raised biochemical markers of myocardial damage at admission.