Abstract

Τhis study examined changes in hip joint flexion angle after an intermittent or a continuous static stretching protocol of equal total duration. Twenty-seven female subjects aged 19.9 ± 3.0 years (14 artistic and rhythmic gymnasts and 13 team sports athletes), performed 3 min of intermittent (6 × 30 s with 30 s rest) or continuous static stretching (3 min) of the hip extensors, with an intensity of 80–90 on a 100-point visual analogue scale. The order of stretching was randomized and counterbalanced, and each subject performed both conditions. Hip flexion angle was measured with the straight leg raise test for both legs after warm-up and immediately after stretching. Both stretching types equally increased hip flexion angle by ~6% (continuous: 140.9° ± 20.4° to 148.6° ± 18.8°, p = 0.047; intermittent: 141.8° ± 20.3° to 150.0° ± 18.8°, p = 0.029) in artistic and rhythmic gymnasts. In contrast, in team sports athletes, only intermittent stretching increased hip flexion angle by 13% (from 91.0° ± 7.2° to 102.4° ± 14.5°, p = 0.001), while continuous stretching did not affect hip angle (from 92.4° ± 6.9° vs. 93.1° ± 9.2°, p = 0.99). The different effect of intermittent vs. continuous stretching on hip flexion between gymnasts and team sports athletes suggests that responses to static stretching are dependent on stretching mode and participants training experience.

Highlights

  • Warm-up routines usually include static stretching in its simplest form [1]

  • The continuous stretching protocol resulted in an increase in hip flexion only in gymnasts by 6%, while no increase was observed in team sport athletes

  • Flexion only in gymnasts by 6%, while no increase was observed in team sport athletes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Static stretching is a widely used type of flexibility training [2,3] which is used to increase joint range of motion (ROM). In a duration dependent manner [4]. In this type of stretching, a limb is moved near to its end point. Transient increases in joint ROM following static stretching are due to a modified stretch sensation [6] and an increased compliance of the musculotendinous unit [7]. Previous research has reported that the total stretch duration is more important for joint ROM enhancement irrespective of whether stretching was performed in a continuous or intermittent manner [12,13]. Recent studies have found that different stretching modes (e.g., intermittent or continuous) induce dissimilar ROM changes [14,15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call