Abstract

BackgroundThere is currently a lack of consensus for the diagnosis, investigations and treatments of acute bacterial prostatitis (AP).MethodsThe symptoms, investigations and treatments of 371 inpatients diagnosed with AP were analyzed through a retrospective study conducted in four departments – Urology (U), Infectious Diseases (ID), Internal Medicine (IM), Geriatrics (G) – of two French university hospitals.ResultsThe cause of admission, symptoms, investigations and treatments depended markedly on the department of admission but not on the hospital. In U, patients commonly presented with a bladder outlet obstruction, they had a large imaging and functional check-up, and received alpha-blockers and anti-inflammatory drugs. In ID, patients were febrile and received longer and more appropriate antibiotic treatments. In G, patients presented with cognitive disorders and commonly had post-void urine volume measurements. In IM, patients presented with a wide range of symptoms, and had very diverse investigations and antibiotic regimen.Overall, a 3:1 ratio of community-acquired AP (CA-AP) to nosocomial AP (N-AP) was observed. Urine culture isolated mainly E. coli (58% of AP, 68% of CA-AP), with venereal agents constituting less than 1%. The probabilistic antibiotic treatments were similar for N-AP and CA-AP (58% bi-therapy; 63% fluoroquinolone-based regimen). For N-AP, these treatments were more likely to be inadequate (42% vs. 8%, p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of bacteriological failure (48% vs. 19%, p < 0.001).Clinical failure at follow-up was more common than bacteriological failure (75% versus 24%, p < 0.001). Patients older than 49 had more underlying urinary tract disorders and a higher rate of clinical failure (30% versus 10%, p < 0.0001).ConclusionThis study highlights the difficulties encountered on a daily basis by the physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of acute prostatitis.

Highlights

  • There is currently a lack of consensus for the diagnosis, investigations and treatments of acute bacterial prostatitis (AP)

  • This study highlights the difficulties encountered on a daily basis by the physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of acute prostatitis

  • Unlike previously published studies that focused on highly selected patients in urological settings or in prostatitis centers, this study presents the analysis of a large group of patients treated for acute prostatitis (AP) in eight different departments of two French university hospitals [9,10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is currently a lack of consensus for the diagnosis, investigations and treatments of acute bacterial prostatitis (AP). There is a current lack of agreement upon guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of male urinary tract infections (UTI), in particular concerning acute prostatitis (AP). In AP, some authors recommend to treat initially for Neisseria gonorrhoaea and Chlamydiae trachomatis in young adults [4]. Others recommend a treatment only for Enterobacteriacae [5]. The antibiotic treatment duration varies from 10 days to 6 weeks [4,6]. This situation is different from UTI in women, where the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment are very similar in different countries [4,2,7,8,5,6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call