Acute and one-year procedural effects with proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation with proactive esophageal cooling - comparison of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction Proactive esophageal cooling is FDA cleared to reduce the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation, and is becoming more prevalent as an alternative to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. Data also suggest shorter procedure times and improved freedom from arrhythmia with esophageal cooling due to the lower continuity index achieved with esophageal cooling. Purpose To determine acute and long-term procedural outcomes of PVI for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using active esophageal cooling. Methods Procedure times and one-year follow-up rhythm status of all patients treated with PVI for paroxysmal and persistent AF by a single operator were reviewed. Patients were treated over the time span February 2020 through July 2022. Procedure times and freedom from atrial arrhythmia were then compared between paroxysmal and persistent AF. Results A total of 317 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were treated over the course of the study timeframe. Of these patients, 167 (52.7%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and 150 had persistent AF. Mean age was 70.6±11.0 years (paroxysmal AF: 68.2±10.4 years and 43% female, persistent AF: 73.4±11.0 years and 37% female), with 40% female overall. Mean procedure time was 68.8±28.1 minutes (61.4 minutes for paroxysmal, 77.3 minutes for persistent). Most patients (224, or 71%) received no fluoroscopy, while the remainder received 1.28±4.0 minutes of fluoroscopy use. The KM estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year for paroxysmal patients was 81.4±3.9%. For persistent patients, the KM estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year was 70.4±4.4% (Figure 1). Conclusions Proactive esophageal cooling is associated with a high rate of long-term freedom from arrhythmia for both paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, as well as short procedure times, and the ability to achieve low or zero fluoroscopy use.Figure 1