Abstract
Controversial reports on the efficacy and possible toxicity of vanadium obtained from various studies may be attributed to differences in the method of diabetes induction and (or) to differences in animal strains. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of these two factors to the effects of vanadium in the treatment of experimental diabetes. Two methods of streptozotocin induction of diabetes in rats have been used for studying the antidiabetic effects of vanadium. One involves a single intravenous injection of 60 mg/kg streptozotocin, and the other uses two subcutaneous injections of 40 mg/kg streptozotocin, to either Wistar or Sprague-Dawley rats. In a 7-week chronic study, Sprague-Dawley rats appeared to develop a more severe diabetes (indicated by higher plasma cholesterol and higher fasting plasma glucose levels) following the single intravenous injection of streptozotocin than rats made diabetic by two subcutaneous injections of streptozotocin. Irrespective of the method of diabetes induction, the responses of all the diabetic animals to chronic vanadyl sulphate treatment were similar. In an acute study, Wistar diabetic rats were more responsive than Sprague-Dawley diabetic rats to vanadyl sulphate and to lower doses (0.6 and 0.8 mmol/kg) of a new organic vanadium compound, bis(maltolato)oxovanadium(i.v.).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
