Abstract

BackgroundPretreatment with 17β-estradiol (E2) is profoundly neuroprotective in young animals subjected to focal and global ischemia. However, whether E2 retains its neuroprotective efficacy in aging animals, especially when administered after brain insult, is largely unknown.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe examined the neuroprotective effects of E2 and two agonists that bind to non-classical estrogen receptors, G1 and STX, when administered after ischemia in middle-aged rats after prolonged ovarian hormone withdrawal. Eight weeks after ovariectomy, middle-aged female rats underwent 10 minutes of global ischemia by four vessel occlusion. Immediately after reperfusion, animals received a single infusion of either E2 (2.25 µg), G1 (50 µg) or STX (50 µg) into the lateral ventricle (ICV) or a single systemic injection of E2 (100 µg/kg). Surviving pyramidal neurons in the hippocampal CA1 were quantified 1 week later. E2 and both agonists that target non-classical estrogen receptors (G1 and STX) administered ICV at the time of reperfusion provided significant levels of neuroprotection, with 55–60% of CA1 neurons surviving vs 15% survival in controls. A single systemic injection of a pharmacological dose of E2 also rescued approximately 50% of CA1 pyramidal neurons destined to die. To determine if E2 and G1 have similar mechanisms of action in hippocampal neurons, we compared the ability of E2 and G1 to modify CA1 pyramidal neuron responses to excitatory inputs from the Schaffer collaterals recorded in hippocampal slices derived from female rats not subjected to global ischemia. E2 and G1 (10 nM) significantly potentiated pyramidal neuron responses to excitatory inputs when applied to hippocampal slices.Conclusions/SignificanceThese findings suggest (1) that middle-aged female rats retain their responsiveness to E2 even after a long period of hormone withdrawal, (2) that non-classical estrogen receptors may mediate the neuroprotective actions of E2 when given after ischemia, and (3) that the neuroprotective efficacy of estrogens may be related to their modulation of synaptic activity in hippocampal slices.

Highlights

  • There is growing evidence that natural and synthetic estrogens exert neuroprotective effects in vivo and in vitro [1,2] suggesting that post-menopausal women might benefit from hormonal supplementation to reduce neurodegeneration associated with brain insults such as stroke or cardiac arrest

  • We report in the present study that central injection of the Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) STX and the GPR30 agonist G1 provides similar levels of neuroprotection as the natural estrogen E2 when administered immediately after global ischemia to middle-aged female rats that had been OVX for 8 weeks before experimentation

  • (1) natural and synthetic estrogens are neuroprotective when administered after ischemia, (2) these neuroprotective properties are retained even after long-term hormone deprivation in aging females, and 3) synthetic estrogens that do not bind classical estrogen receptor (ER) are as neuroprotective as E2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is growing evidence that natural and synthetic estrogens exert neuroprotective effects in vivo and in vitro [1,2] suggesting that post-menopausal women might benefit from hormonal supplementation to reduce neurodegeneration associated with brain insults such as stroke or cardiac arrest. If synthetic estrogenic compounds designed to treat menopausal symptoms mimic the pleiotropic effects of the natural estrogen 17b-estradiol (E2), the benefits of such hormonal therapy might be outweighed by the reported negative effects of long-term postmenopausal hormone therapy, including higher risk of thrombosis and breast cancer [3,4]. An alternative to natural estrogens or long-term hormone treatment to protect against brain insults in aging patients would be synthetic molecules that are designed to be administered after an ischemic event and that act with greater selectivity than E2. Whether E2 retains its neuroprotective efficacy in aging animals, especially when administered after brain insult, is largely unknown

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call