Acupuncture for preventing progression of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (ATP): A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Abstract

TPS12154 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) from chemotherapy drugs such as taxanes can be detrimental to cancer survival, increasing the risk of falls and worsening physical functions. The current management of worsening and persistent CIPN during chemotherapy is dose reduction or discontinuation of chemotherapy. There is no effective treatment or preventative measure for CIPN. Methods: Trial design: The ATP trial is a two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial comparing weekly real acupuncture (RA) versus sham acupuncture (SA) during preplanned curative intent taxane containing regimens in patients with breast cancer. Eligibility criteria: English or Spanish-proficient; aged ≥18 years; histological diagnoses of invasive carcinoma of the breast; and plan to receive curative intent chemotherapy regimen containing paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel weekly or biweekly as standard of care, developed CIPN grade ≥1 based on the NCI-CTCAE version 5.0, while receiving taxane; ≥ four weeks of paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel weekly or biweekly planned, as standard of care and at treating physician’s discretion; willing to adhere to requirement that no new pain medication or dose changes be taken throughout the first 12 weeks of the study period; and willing to adhere to all study-related procedures. Specific aims: The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of RA versus SA in preventing taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy progression as measured by Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer who are receiving curative intent neurotoxic chemotherapy. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of RA versus SA on chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI) and CIPN-related chemotherapy discontinuation. Statistical methods: We will randomize 80 patients, 40 to each arm. All randomized patients will be evaluable in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analyses because all will have completed the baseline assessment before randomization. We will use a linear mixed model (LMM) to compare the change in NPS between the arms from baseline to week 4. Based on our pilot data, a difference in CIPN grade from 1 to 2 corresponded to a difference in NPS from 12 to 22, a difference of ten points in 27 patients. The NPS standard deviation (SD) in patients with grade 1 CIPN was 17. With 80 patients we will have 80% power to detect a difference between arms as small as 10 points on the NPS, assuming a one-sided test, type I error of 5%, correlation between baseline and follow-up measurements of 0.5, SD of 17, and 15% attrition at week 4. Present accrual and target accrual: We accrued 43 participants in the intervention phase by the end of January 2024; the target accrual is 80 participants. Clinical trial information: NCT05458284 .