Abstract

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR). Randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial conducted from May 2004 to February 2005. 80 patients with PAR (age, 16–70 years) were randomly assigned to receive real or sham acupuncture. After a 1-week baseline period, participants were tre ated twice weekly for 8 weeks and followed up for another 12 weeks. Nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhoea and nasal itch were each self-assessed daily on a 5-point scale, and scores were aggregated weekly. The sum of the symptom scores (total nasal symptom score, TNSS) was also determined. A secondary outcome was use of PAR relief medication. After 8 weeks’ treatment, the weekly mean difference in TNSS from baseline was greater with real (−17.2; 95 % CI, −24.6 to −9.8) than with sham acupuncture (−4.2; 95 % CI, −11.0 to 2.7) (P = 0.01). The decrease in individual symptom score was also greater with real acupuncture for rhinorrhoea (P < 0.01) but not the other symptoms. At the end of follow-up, the greater difference in TNSS from baseline in the real acupuncture group was still apparent: real, −21.0 (95 % CI, −29.1 to −12.9) versus sham, −2.3 (95 % CI, −10.2 to 5.6) (P = 0.001). Moreover, the differences from baseline in all four individual symptom scores were greater for the real than for the sham group (P < 0.05). Real and sham acupuncture were both well tolerated. Our findings suggest that acupuncture is effective in the symptomatic treatment of PAR.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call