Abstract
The purpose of this article is to offer a critical discussion of the practice turn in contemporary educational research. In order to make the discussion specific, I use two influential theories, namely activity theory and situated learning theory. They both turn to the notion of practice in order to overcome the limitations of mentalist and structuralist accounts of educational phenomena. Together they represent some of the most influential attempts to transcend the dualistic tendencies of the dominant theoretical paradigms of educational research such as structuralist theories and educational theories that place mind and mental processes at their centre. Activity theory and situated learning theory offer very different accounts of the nature, scope and relevance of institutional, social and material contexts when accounting for the meanings and functions of any particular action or activity. While situated learning theory offers a more internal perspective, activity theory offers a more external perspective on human practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.