Abstract

Word of mouth recommendations influence a wide range of choices and behaviors. What takes place in the mind of recommendation receivers that determines whether they will be successfully influenced? Prior work suggests that brain systems implicated in assessing the value of stimuli (i.e., subjective valuation) and understanding others’ mental states (i.e., mentalizing) play key roles. The current study used neuroimaging and natural language classifiers to extend these findings in a naturalistic context and tested the extent to which the two systems work together or independently in responding to social influence. First, we show that in response to text-based social media recommendations, activity in both the brain’s valuation system and mentalizing system was associated with greater likelihood of opinion change. Second, participants were more likely to update their opinions in response to negative, compared to positive, recommendations, with activity in the mentalizing system scaling with the negativity of the recommendations. Third, decreased functional connectivity between valuation and mentalizing systems was associated with opinion change. Results highlight the role of brain regions involved in mentalizing and positive valuation in recommendation propagation, and further show that mentalizing may be particularly key in processing negative recommendations, whereas the valuation system is relevant in evaluating both positive and negative recommendations.

Highlights

  • Word of mouth recommendations influence a wide range of choices and behaviors

  • These processes are associated with specific networks in the brain: (1) the valuation system, which includes ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and ventral striatum (VS)[12], and (2) the mentalizing system, which includes portions of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), subregions in the middle and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (MMPFC, DMPFC), as well as bilateral temporoparietal junction (TPJ), precuneus (PC/PCC), superior temporal sulcus (STS), and temporal ­poles[13,14]

  • We focus on results using the machine learning classifier measure of sentiment because this measure is scalable and reproducible, but analogous analyses using the human coded measures of sentiment produce similar results, thereby increasing our confidence in the machine classifier and validating our approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Word of mouth recommendations influence a wide range of choices and behaviors. What takes place in the mind of recommendation receivers that determines whether they will be successfully influenced? Prior work suggests that brain systems implicated in assessing the value of stimuli (i.e., subjective valuation) and understanding others’ mental states (i.e., mentalizing) play key roles. One possibility is that increased coordination between activity in the brain’s valuation and mentalizing systems in response to peer recommendations might be associated with greater recommendation rating change.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call