Abstract

The Next Generation Science Standards call for students to “investigate the natural world through the processes of scientific inquiry.” Yet, it is rare for secondary students in the U.S. to engage in authentic scientific investigations of natural phenomena. The Columbia River Estuary Science Education and Outreach (CRESCENDO) Project was a 2-year (2016–2018) university-high school partnership between scientists and science education researchers from Washington State University (WSU) and science teachers and students from five public high schools located adjacent to the Columbia River Estuary (CRE). The teachers and students collaborated with WSU scientists on a rigorous ecological study of the CRE, which provided an opportunity to study how engaging students in authentic scientific research would impact their ecological knowledge and their attitudes toward environmental stewardship. Our study methods included online attitude surveys and knowledge assessments for all participating students, classroom observations, and semi-structured small group interviews with 3–5 students from each school at the end of each year of the project. We found that many students made significant gains in their ecological knowledge and understanding of scientific inquiry practices, demonstrating deeper understanding of the connections between local land use and water quality in the CRE, as well how nutrient concentrations vary seasonally and along the axis of the estuary. Students also showed enthusiasm for taking part in a “real” scientific research project, collaborating with university scientists, contributing “their” data to an investigative effort that extended beyond their own school, and the opportunity to get outdoors during science class. We identified five “key elements” of the CRESCENDO project that contributed to its success, and which would allow our model of a consistent, long-term (months) and immersive research experience for high school students to be transferrable to university-school partnerships across a range of size, location, research mission, and resource availability. Finally, this project also provided more evidence in support of place-based approaches for student learning, and the importance of immersing students in their environments where they can study the natural world by asking relevant questions and generating novel data about the science topics that matter to them.

Highlights

  • The Generation Science Standards for K-12 science education call for students to “investigate the natural world through the processes of scientific inquiry” in order to define natural systems, identify the boundaries and interactions within an ecosystem, and develop models to explain interactions and cause-effect relationships (Achieve Inc., 2013)

  • Secondary students in the U.S have few learning opportunities that involve authentic scientific investigations of natural phenomena (Banilower et al, 2010; Trygstad et al, 2020). In response to this need, we developed the Columbia River Estuary Science Education and Outreach (CRESCENDO) Project as a unique and transferable, 2-year university-high school partnership between aquatic science and science education research faculty on the Vancouver, WA, campus of Washington State University (WSU) and science teachers and their students from five public high schools located in southwest Washington and adjacent to the Columbia River Estuary (CRE) (Figure 1)

  • Students who participated in the CRESCENDO project made significant gains in their ecological knowledge of the CRE as well as in their understanding of scientific inquiry practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Generation Science Standards for K-12 science education call for students to “investigate the natural world through the processes of scientific inquiry” in order to define natural systems, identify the boundaries and interactions within an ecosystem, and develop models to explain interactions and cause-effect relationships (Achieve Inc., 2013). The teachers and students collaborated with university scientists on an intensive and rigorous ecological study of the estuary that provided opportunities for students to engage in authentic scientific inquiry and scientific practices, which we predicted would impact students’ understandings of scientific concepts and their understanding of science as a human endeavor (Rahm et al, 2003; Peker and Dolan, 2012). We intentionally situated this environmental research in the CRE, a place located in the students’ own neighborhoods and personally familiar and relevant for them, and where the aquatic ecologists on our team have on-going scientific research. Such place-based engagement holds the potential for increasing students’ understandings of the connections between human activities and decisions and environmental health, and possibly raising their interest in environmental stewardship (Bouillion and Gomez, 2001; Radinsky et al, 2001; Preston and Griffiths, 2004; Shume, 2016; Semken et al, 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call