Abstract

The aim of this review is to evaluate the current evidence regarding the best management in terms of active surveillance of angiomyolipoma (AML) cases less than 4 cm, particularly the optimal timing of active surveillance. In addition, we aimed to describe their initial size, clinical presentation, and growth rates. The present systematic review included prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated and followed up patients with AML through active surveillance. Studies were retrieved through an online bibliographic search of the Medline database via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from their inception to January 2022. Seven studies were included in the present systematic review. Concerning the active surveillance protocol, only four studies describe the frequency of active surveillance and the utilized imaging modality. Some studies followed up lesions by ultrasound annually for two to five years, while other studies followed-up patients twice for the first year, then annually for a median follow-up period of 49 (9-89) months. The used modalities were ultrasound, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Notably, the incidence of spontaneous bleeding was consistent across the included studies (ranging from 2.3 - 3.1%), except for one study which showed an incidence rate of 15.3%. In terms of the need for active treatment, the rate of active treatment was slightly higher in some studies than the others. However, this variation could not be considered clinically relevant to favor one surveillance strategy over the other. We concluded that active surveillance is the first line of management in all small asymptomatic ALMs. ALMs less than 2 cm do not require active surveillance. The current published literature suggested that active surveillance for two years may provide the same benefits as a five-year surveillance strategy, with fewer radiation hazards and less socioeconomic burden.

Highlights

  • IntroductionOne of the most prevalent solid benign renal masses is angiomyolipoma (AML)

  • BackgroundOne of the most prevalent solid benign renal masses is angiomyolipoma (AML)

  • The aim of this review is to evaluate the current evidence regarding the best management in terms of active surveillance of angiomyolipoma (AML) cases less than 4 cm, the optimal timing of active surveillance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most prevalent solid benign renal masses is angiomyolipoma (AML). In patients with tuberous sclerosis, AMLs have a tendency for faster growth rate, higher rates of spontaneous bleeding, more aggressive behavior, and a higher incidence of intervention [2]. The prevalence of sporadic AML is believed to be 0.44% in the general population, with the majority of cases being discovered incidentally in asymptomatic patients [3, 4]. The majority of renal AMLs are asymptomatic; abdominal and flank pain and haematuria are typical clinical symptoms [6]. Spontaneous growth and bleeding can occur despite the benign nature of these tumors, especially in tumors larger than 4 cm [7-9]. AML larger than 4 cm are more likely to require surgical intervention; this size cut-off point has lately been questioned [12-15]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call