Abstract
Differentiation between lethal and non-lethal prostate cancer subtypes has become a very important issue in avoiding excessive treatment in an era when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has reduced the rate of prostate cancer deaths by more than 20%. However, it is difficult to determine the patients who may or may not benefit from immediate treatment interventions at the time of the initial diagnosis. The selection of candidate patients who can postpone immediate treatment and undergo follow-ups with a specific surveillance program, or 'active surveillance,' is a practical way to minimize overtreatment. In this review, the benefits and risks of active surveillance are discussed. Future perspectives, including imaging and new biomarkers for improving the outcomes of active surveillance programs, are also discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
