Abstract

This paper introduces a new paradigm that allows one to quantify the Bayesian beliefs evidenced by subjects during oculomotor pursuit. Subjects' eye tracking responses to a partially occluded sinusoidal target were recorded non-invasively and averaged. These response averages were then analysed using dynamic causal modelling (DCM). In DCM, observed responses are modelled using biologically plausible generative or forward models - usually biophysical models of neuronal activity. Our key innovation is to use a generative model based on a normative (Bayes-optimal) model of active inference to model oculomotor pursuit in terms of subjects' beliefs about how visual targets move and how their oculomotor system responds. Our aim here is to establish the face validity of the approach, by manipulating the content and precision of sensory information - and examining the ensuing changes in the subjects' implicit beliefs. These beliefs are inferred from their eye movements using the normative model. We show that on average, subjects respond to an increase in the 'noise' of target motion by increasing sensory precision in their models of the target trajectory. In other words, they attend more to the sensory attributes of a noisier stimulus. Conversely, subjects only change kinetic parameters in their model but not precision, in response to increased target speed. Using this technique one can estimate the precisions of subjects' hierarchical Bayesian beliefs about target motion. We hope to apply this paradigm to subjects with schizophrenia, whose pursuit abnormalities may result from the abnormal encoding of precision.

Highlights

  • This paper considers the modelling of oculomotor pursuit using active inference – a normative or Bayes-optimal formulation of action and perception which has been used to address a range of issues in the cognitive neurosciences (Friston et al, 2010a)

  • It appears that subjects respond to noisy stimuli by directing attention to the stimulus, rather than suppressing confidence in prior beliefs about its motion. This maintenance of prior precision is consistent with the observation that increasing target motion noise had no effect on residual pursuit velocity (RPV) during occlusion: had prior precision decreased, we would have expected a lower residual (saccade-free) pursuit velocity (RPV) during occlusion, as we have shown in previous modelling work (Adams et al, 2012) – and as is found in many studies of schizophrenic SPEM (O’Driscoll and Callahan, 2008)

  • The beliefs in question here are formal Bayesian beliefs expressed in terms of normative models of oculomotor pursuit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A crucial aspect of this inference is the proper weighting of sensory evidence and prior beliefs This rests upon weighting prediction errors in accord with their precision (reliability or inverse variability). New method: Our key innovation is to use a generative model based on a normative (Bayes-optimal) model of active inference to model oculomotor pursuit in terms of subjects’ beliefs about how visual targets move and how their oculomotor system responds. Our aim here is to establish the face validity of the approach, by manipulating the content and precision of sensory information – and examining the ensuing changes in the subjects’ implicit beliefs These beliefs are inferred from their eye movements using the normative model. We hope to apply this paradigm to subjects with schizophrenia, whose pursuit abnormalities may result from the abnormal encoding of precision

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.