Abstract
The first part of C. G. Jung's Answer to Job is often misunderstood because of Jung's very emotional and personal attack on the figure of Yahweh. This article offers an examination of the first part of Answer to Job as an example of Jung's psychological technique of active imagination. The second part of the book then can be seen as a product of Jung's personal confrontation with the dark aspect of the God-image.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
