Abstract

Abstract. The general basin and range Apennine topographic characteristic is generally attributed to the presently active normal fault systems, whose long-term activity (throughout the Quaternary) is supposed to have been responsible for the creation of morphological/structural highs and lows. By coupling field geological survey and geophysical investigations, we reconstructed the 3-D geological model of an inner tectonic basin of the central Apennines, the Subequana Valley, bounded to the northeast by the southern segment of one of the major active and seismogenic normal faults of the Apennines, known as the Middle Aterno Valley–Subequana Valley fault system. Our analyses revealed that, since the late Pliocene, the basin evolved in a double half-graben configuration through a polyphase tectonic development. An early phase, Late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene in age, was controlled by the ENE–WSW-striking and SSE-dipping Avezzano–Bussi fault, that determined the formation of an early depocentre towards the N–NW. Subsequently, the main fault became the NW–SE-striking faults, which drove the formation during the Quaternary of a new fault-related depocentre towards the NE. By considering the available geological information, a similar structural evolution has likely involved three close tectonic basins aligned along the Avezzano–Bussi fault, namely the Fucino Basin, the Subequana Valley, and the Sulmona Basin, and it has been probably experienced by other tectonic basins of the chain. The present work therefore points out the role of pre-existing transverse tectonic structures, inherited by previous tectonic phases, in accommodating the ongoing tectonic deformation and, consequently, in influencing the structural characteristics of the major active normal faults. This has implications in terms of earthquake fault rupture propagation and segmentation. Lastly, the morpho-tectonic setting of the Apennine chain results from the superposition of deformation events whose geological legacy must be considered in a wider evolutionary perspective. Our results testify that a large-scale basin and range geomorphological feature – often adopted for morpho-tectonic and kinematic evaluations in active extensional contexts, as in the Apennines – just led by range-bounding active normal faults may be actually simplistic, as it could not be applied everywhere, owing to peculiar complexities of the local tectonic histories.

Highlights

  • The presently active normal fault systems are commonly supposed to be the major ones responsible for the recent and present-day regional morpho-tectonic aspect of the central Apennine chain

  • As for the Avezzano–Bussi fault (ABF), in agreement with Galadini and Messina (2001), our observations indicate that, as in the Fucino Basin, it likely played during the Quaternary – and may still play – the role of releasing fault in the Subequana Valley and the Sulmona Basin, with the difference that in the Fucino Basin and the Subequana Valley, the active fault systems cut across the ABF, while in the Sulmona Basin, the Mt Morrone fault ends against the ABF

  • At a wider scale, the authors proposed an age of 2.5–3.3 Ma for the initiation of NW–SE-trending fault activity in the central Apennines, which is roughly consistent with the age that we propose for the onset of the Fucino, Subequana Valley, and Sulmona faults activity, when the ABF was still leading the formation of the early basins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The presently active normal fault systems are commonly supposed to be the major ones responsible for the recent and present-day regional morpho-tectonic aspect of the central Apennine chain. Since the late Pliocene, extension took place through normal fault systems presently occurring at the boundary between intermontane basins and mountain ranges (e.g. Cavinato and De Celles, 1999; Galadini and Messina, 2004). An ancient morphogenetic phase, subsequent to the compressive tectonic phase but shortly preceding the onset of extensional deformation, shaped an embryonic central Apennine relief. The related geomorphic signature is represented by the remnants of a low-gradient erosional relict landscape, presently detectable at high elevations along the mountain slopes, carved into the compressively deformed bedrocks and which has been subsequently displaced by the extensional faults (Centamore et al, 2003; Galadini et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call