Abstract
In Reply. —Dr Mazziotti points out some of the challenges in designing and executing a study to determine the effectiveness of different methods of CPR. When comparing two treatment groups, it is essential that both methods of CPR are performed correctly, in similar patient populations, and that the study design enables adequate data acquisition of critical variables associated with the research, as described by the Utstein conference on uniform standards for CPR research. 1 In our evaluation of the effectiveness of ACD CPR in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, our study was designed to maximize the clinical similarities between patients in both treatment groups. Data were collected according to the Utstein recommendations. Mazziotti points out the importance of similar clinical characteristics between groups. In our study, both the standard CPR group and the ACD CPR group had very similar baseline characteristics in terms of age, sex, prior cardiac history, presenting
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.