Abstract

In developing chick skeletal muscle, micromolar concentrations of extracellular ATP elicit an early excitatory response followed by a late potassium conductance increase.' The potassium conductance activates with a delay of approximately one second and is greatly reduced at low temperature, suggesting that a second messenger may be involved. To examine the mechanism of activation of the potassium channels, we recorded from myoballs using the whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp configurations. When whole-cell recordings were made from myoballs held at the reversal potential for the early excitatory current, ATP elicited an outward potassium current. Noise analysis yielded spectral estimates for the single-channel conductance of approximately 20 pS. To determine whether these channels are activated by a second messenger, recordings were made from cell-attached patches while ATP was applied outside the pipette. It seemed unlikely that a highly charged molecule like ATP could cross the membrane-pipette seal, so we expected that channels within the patch should only be activated if this system used a second messenger. We observed the opening of potassium channels in response to ATP application outside of the pipette (FIG. 1) in about 60% of the cell-attached patches. To be sure that ATP was not gaining direct access to the pipette interior, some of these experiments were performed in the presence of the ATP receptor antagonist DIDS. When both DIDS and ATP were added to the solution outside of the pipette there was no activation of channels in the patch. However, when DIDS was present inside of the patch pipette, but not in the bathing solution (so as to selectively block the response to any ATP that managed to get across the seal), ATP applied outside of the pipette was still able to evoke potassium channel opening. These experiments indicated that the potassium channels must be activated by a second messenger. The opening of potassium channels in response to ATP could also be observed in outside-out patches (FIG. 2). This result strongly suggests that the second messenger is restricted to the plasma membrane. In excised patch recordings the cytoplasmic face of the membrane is bathed by a huge volume of solution, and it seems unlikely that the concentration of a cytoplasmic second messenger could rise enough to elicit a response. A membranous second messenger would not be diluted by the solution inside the patch pipette.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call