Abstract

Liver X Receptors (LXR) control cholesterol metabolism and exert anti-inflammatory actions but their contribution to human macrophage polarization remains unclear. The LXR pathway is enriched in pro-inflammatory macrophages from rheumatoid arthritis as well as in tumors-associated macrophages from human tumors. We now report that LXR activation inhibits the anti-inflammatory gene and functional profile of M-CSF-dependent human macrophages, and prompts the acquisition of a pro-inflammatory gene signature, with both effects being blocked by an LXR inverse agonist. Mechanistically, the LXR-stimulated macrophage polarization shift correlates with diminished expression of MAFB and MAF, which govern the macrophage anti-inflammatory profile, and with enhanced release of activin A. Indeed, LXR activation impaired macrophage polarization in response to tumor-derived ascitic fluids, as well as the expression of MAF- and MAFB-dependent genes. Our results demonstrate that LXR activation limits the anti-inflammatory human macrophage polarization and prompts the acquisition of an inflammatory transcriptional and functional profile.

Highlights

  • Macrophages defend the organism against endogenous danger signals and exogenous threats, and initiate and resolve inflammatory responses

  • We report that Liver X Receptors (LXR) activation impairs the acquisition of the transcriptional and functional properties of anti-inflammatory M-MØ and Tumor-derived Ascitic Fluid (TAF)-MØ, and inhibits the expression of the transcription factors (MAF, MAFB) that shape the gene and functional profile of M-CSFdependent macrophages

  • The transcriptome of M-MØ shows a very strong enrichment of genes preferentially expressed by large tumorassociated macrophages (Figure 1B), whose presence associates with a lower disease-free survival rate in colorectal liver metastasis [42], while the transcriptome of GMMØ resembles the specific gene profile of “small TAM” [42] and rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid macrophages (RASF-MØ) [53] (Figure 1B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Macrophages defend the organism against endogenous danger signals and exogenous threats, and initiate and resolve inflammatory responses. To perform these tasks, macrophages can display a huge spectrum of activation (“polarization”) states, whose acquisition depends on their. M-CSF is indispensable for tissue-resident and monocyte-derived macrophage differentiation [6–9], and primes macrophages (M-MØ) for acquisition of an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive profile (IL10high TNFlow IL23low IL6low) [5, 10–19]. M-MØ resemble tissue-resident ‘trophic’ macrophages, whereas GM-MØ represent proinflammatory monocyte-derived macrophages In line with their effector functions, M-MØ and GM-MØ exhibit distinct transcriptional profiles [10, 13, 20–22] that resemble those of human resident and inflammatory macrophages in vivo [20, 23– 25], and differ in their responsiveness to the immunosuppressant drug methotrexate (MTX) [26, 27]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call