Abstract

The development of targeted inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, has led to improved clinical outcome for melanoma patients with BRAFV600E mutations. Although the initial response to these inhibitors can be dramatic, sometimes causing complete tumor regression, the majority of melanomas eventually become resistant. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) mutations are found in primary melanomas and frequently reported in BRAF melanomas that develop resistance to targeted therapy; however, melanoma is a molecularly heterogeneous cancer, and which mutations are drivers and which are passengers remains to be determined. In this study, we demonstrate that in BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines, activating MEK mutations drive resistance and contribute to suboptimal growth of melanoma cells following the withdrawal of BRAF inhibition. In this manner, the cells are drug-addicted, suggesting that melanoma cells evolve a ‘just right’ level of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and the additive effects of MEK and BRAF mutations are counterproductive. We also used a novel mouse model of melanoma to demonstrate that several of these MEK mutants promote the development, growth and maintenance of melanoma in vivo in the context of Cdkn2a and Pten loss. By utilizing a genetic approach to control mutant MEK expression in vivo, we were able to induce tumor regression and significantly increase survival; however, after a long latency, all tumors subsequently became resistant. These data suggest that resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors is probably inevitable, and novel therapeutic approaches are needed to target dormant tumors.

Highlights

  • The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is constitutively activated in over 85% of malignant cutaneous melanomas, due to BRAF (~40%), NRAS (~25%), NF1 (~13%) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) (~8%) mutations.[1,2,3] BRAFV600E/D/K mutations (BRAFT1799A/G/GTIndelAA) lead to constitutive kinase activity and elevated downstream signaling, which drives cell proliferation and survival; these mutations are found in benign nevi, and alone are insufficient for malignancy.[4]

  • To compare the activity of a panel of MEK1 mutations found in BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cell lines, 293FT cells, which have low basal MAPK activity, were transfected with a bicistronic green fluorescent protein (GFP) vector containing either wild-type MEK, MEKIndel55RT, MEKQ56P, MEKV60E, MEKC121S, MEKG128V MEKP124L, MEKV154L, MEKGF or BRAFV600E

  • Using the RCAS/Dct:Tumor Viruses A (TVA) mouse model of melanoma, we found that gain-of-function MEK1 mutations (V60E, C121S and GF) are capable of transforming melanoma cells in vitro and driving highgrade melanoma in the context of Cdkn2a and Pten loss

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is constitutively activated in over 85% of malignant cutaneous melanomas, due to BRAF (~40%), NRAS (~25%), NF1 (~13%) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) (~8%) mutations.[1,2,3] BRAFV600E/D/K mutations (BRAFT1799A/G/GTIndelAA) lead to constitutive kinase activity and elevated downstream signaling, which drives cell proliferation and survival; these mutations are found in benign nevi, and alone are insufficient for malignancy.[4]. In patients with late-stage BRAFV600E melanomas, BRAF inhibitors (for example, dabrafenib or vemurafenib) confer a survival advantage when compared with chemotherapy, demonstrating improvements in response-rates, progression-free survival and overall survival.[8,9] Initial responses to BRAF inhibitors are not durable, and patient relapse usually occurs within 6–7 months.[8,10] The use of concurrent BRAF and MEK inhibitors (for example, cobimetinib, selumetinib or trametinib) for patients with melanoma has been established as a synergistic treatment approach and one that has further improved response compared with BRAF monotherapy.[11] the majority of patients still develop resistance[12,13] (Figure 1). Mechanisms of resistance to single agent or combination therapies include mutations in MEK1 (MAP2K1)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call