Abstract
The article discusses the conditions for qualifying actions in someone else’s interest without a mandate and the requirements that must be met in order to obtain the right to reimburse the expenses incurred. The problems that arise in judicial practice during the qualification of these actions are identified. A comparative analysis of obligations arising from actions in the interest of others, and obligations from unjust enrichment. The author concluded that obligations from actions in the interests of others and obligations from unjust enrichment should not be mixed, and therefore there was a need to develop more clearly defined criteria to distinguish between the scope of these obligations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
