Abstract

What can be gained by making a distinction between action learning and action research? The question is more than rhetorical. It can make a world of difference which approach you use, depending on your purpose. Further, if you should choose action learning, it can make a world of difference which particular “brand” you select, depending on how you view human beings and how comfortable you are with the assumption that they have capacities to self-direct their learning and their work. My contention is that action learning and action research are not identical, not even “blood brothers” — if for no other reason than that they spring from different origins and traditions. They do not share the same orientation towards the world. Having had “classic” experiences of both, I conclude that the difference between them is more significant than most people realize, and that misperceptions diminish the strengths of each.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call