Abstract

Despite the potential of acrylic bone cement (ABC) loaded with chitosan (CS) for orthopedic applications, there are only a few in vitro studies of this composite with CS loading ≤ 15 wt.% evaluated in bioactivity tests in simulated body fluid (SBF) for duration > 30 days. The purpose of the present work was to address this shortcoming of the literature. In addition to bioactivity, a wide range of cement properties were determined for composites with CS loading ranging from 0 to 20 wt.%. These properties included maximum exotherm temperature (Tmax), setting time (tset), water contact angle, residual monomer content, flexural strength, bending modulus, glass transition temperature, and water uptake. For cement with CS loading ≥ 15 wt.%, there was an increase in bioactivity, increase in biocompatibility, decrease in Tmax, increase in tset, all of which are desirable trends, but increase in residual monomer content and decrease in each of the mechanical properties, with each of these trends, were undesirable. Thus, a composite with CS loading of 15 wt.% should be further characterized to explore its suitability for use in low-weight-bearing applications, such as bone void filler and balloon kyphoplasty.

Highlights

  • Acrylic bone cement (ABC) has played a pivotal role in orthopedic surgery

  • The purpose of the present study was to determine the influence of CS loading on hydrolytic degradation, bioactivity, and several handling, physical, and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement (ABC) loaded with ≤ 20 wt.% CS, with testing in simulated body fluid (SBF) over 28 weeks

  • Methyl methacrylate (MMA), 2-(diethylamino) ethyl acrylate (DEAEA), 2-(diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (DEAEM), benzoyl peroxide (BPO), and chitosan from shrimp shells with a molecular weight between 190–310 KDa and deacetylation degree of 88% were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Palo Alto, CA, USA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acrylic bone cement (ABC) has played a pivotal role in orthopedic surgery. ABC is biocompatible, and, in a TJR, it provides fast fixation between the bone and the implant. ABC has some disadvantages, such as a high maximum exothermic temperature (Tmax ) [2], a lack of bioactivity [3,4,5], and monomer toxicity [6]. Bioactive materials are those that can stimulate a biological response in their environment. These are classified into three groups: Osteoconductive are materials that stimulate bone growth on the surface; osseointegration are materials that can stimulate the growth of new bone, forming a stable anchorage with the bone, and osteoinductive substances can induce bone formation in parts where the bone does not naturally grow [7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call