Abstract

Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Generally an arterial aneurysm is defined as a localized arterial dilatation ≥50 % greater than the normal diameter. Imaging studies are important in diagnosing the cause of a pulsatile abdominal mass and, if an AAA is found, in determining its size and involvement of abdominal branches. Ultrasound (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice when a pulsatile abdominal mass is present. Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) may be substituted in patients for whom US is not suitable. When aneurysms have reached the size threshold for intervention or are clinically symptomatic, contrast-enhanced multidetector CT angiography (CTA) is the best diagnostic and preintervention planning study, accurately delineating the location, size, and extent of aneurysm and the involvement of branch vessels. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) may be substituted if CT cannot be performed. Catheter arteriography has some utility in patients with significant contraindications to both CTA and MRA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Highlights

  • The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness CriteriaÒ through society representation on expert panels

  • An arterial aneurysm is defined as a localized arterial dilatation C50 % greater than the normal diameter

  • Catheter arteriography has some utility in patients with significant contraindications to both CT angiography (CTA) and Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)

Read more

Summary

Also enables preinterventional planning

See statement regarding contrast in text under ‘‘anticipated exceptions’’. Replaced by cross-sectional imaging for diagnostic purposes. Rating scale: 1–3 usually not appropriate, 4–6 may be appropriate, 7–9 usually appropriate a Relative radiation level

RRLa O
Computed tomography
Magnetic resonance angiography
Catheter arteriography
Summary
Anticipated exceptions
Findings
Relative radiation level information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call