Abstract

This study provides a conceptual framework and an empirical methodology to assess the impact of acquisition experience on acquisition performance. Previous literature on the impact of experiential learning on acquisition performance has led to mixed results. We suggest that these inconsistencies stem from two sources: inappropriate specification of performance, and neglect to account for acquisition management processes and value creation mechanisms. Most previous studies measure acquisition performance at an aggregate level, using stock market returns. In this study, we utilize patent data from technology sourcing acquisitions to measure performance tied to the focal acquisition. Using patent data, we also distinguish between two value creation mechanisms with differing levels of complexity. Our results indicate that experiential learning enables performance of the less complex value creation activities, while hindering performance of the more complex value creation activities. We find that performance measures that are closely related to focal acquisition performance provide different conclusions for the effect of experience than do studies conducted at more aggregate levels of performance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.