Abstract

Abstract. The crystal orientation fabric (COF) in ice cores provides detailed information, such as grain size and distribution and the orientation of the crystals in relation to the large-scale glacier flow. These data are relevant for a profound understanding of the dynamics and deformation history of glaciers and ice sheets. The intrinsic, mechanical anisotropy of the ice crystals causes an anisotropy of the polycrystalline ice of glaciers and affects the velocity of acoustic waves propagating through the ice. Here, we employ such acoustic waves to obtain the seismic anisotropy of ice core samples and compare the results with calculated acoustic velocities derived from COF analyses. These samples originate from an ice core from Rhonegletscher (Rhone Glacier), a temperate glacier in the Swiss Alps. Point-contact transducers transmit ultrasonic P waves with a dominant frequency of 1 MHz into the ice core samples and measure variations in the travel times of these waves for a set of azimuthal angles. In addition, the elasticity tensor is obtained from laboratory-measured COF, and we calculate the associated seismic velocities. We compare these COF-derived velocity profiles with the measured ultrasonic profiles. Especially in the presence of large ice grains, these two methods show significantly different velocities since the ultrasonic measurements examine a limited volume of the ice core, whereas the COF-derived velocities are integrated over larger parts of the core. This discrepancy between the ultrasonic and COF-derived profiles decreases with an increasing number of grains that are available within the sampling volume, and both methods provide consistent results in the presence of a similar amount of grains. We also explore the limitations of ultrasonic measurements and provide suggestions for improving their results. These ultrasonic measurements could be employed continuously along the ice cores. They are suitable to support the COF analyses by bridging the gaps between discrete measurements since these ultrasonic measurements can be acquired within minutes and do not require an extensive preparation of ice samples when using point-contact transducers.

Highlights

  • Improved glacier flow models require a profound knowledge on sub- and englacial processes and the properties governing these processes

  • The data for studying englacial processes are usually derived either from borehole measurements or from ice core analyses. These ice core analyses provide useful physical properties, such as elastic parameters, density, electric conductivity, and permittivity (e.g. Freitag et al, 2004; Wilhelms, 2005). Most of these properties are anisotropic in ice cores because the physical properties of a single ice crystal vary along its principal axes, and the crystals usually exhibit preferential orientations under deformation

  • It is an indicator for the internal ice structure at the ice core location, which allows for a classification of the ice as “soft” or “hard” depending on the direction of the strain rates relative to the crystal orientation fabric (COF) (e.g. Budd and Jacka, 1989; Faria et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Improved glacier flow models require a profound knowledge on sub- and englacial processes and the properties governing these processes. The data for studying englacial processes are usually derived either from borehole measurements or from ice core analyses These ice core analyses provide useful physical properties, such as elastic parameters, density, electric conductivity, and permittivity The COF is governed by the stress field and the ice deformation and preserves the ice flow history of a glacier or ice sheet (Budd, 1972; Azuma and Higashi, 1984; Alley, 1988) It is an indicator for the internal ice structure at the ice core location, which allows for a classification of the ice as “soft” or “hard” depending on the direction of the strain rates relative to the COF Information on the anisotropic ice flow dynamics of a glacier has successfully been incorporated in ice flow models by GilletChaulet et al (2005), Placidi et al (2010), and Graham et al (2018)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.