Abstract

Citizen science is promoted as a simple and cost-effective alternative to traditional approaches for the monitoring of populations of marine megafauna. However, the reliability of datasets collected by these initiatives often remains poorly quantified. We compared datasets of shark counts collected by professional dive guides with acoustic telemetry data from tagged sharks collected at the same coral reef sites over a period of five years. There was a strong correlation between the number of grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) observed by dive guides and the telemetry data at both daily and monthly intervals, suggesting that variation in relative abundance of sharks was detectable in datasets collected by dive guides in a similar manner to data derived from telemetry at these time scales. There was no correlation between the number or mean depth of sharks recorded by telemetry and the presence of tourist divers, suggesting that the behaviour of sharks was not affected by the presence of divers during our study. Data recorded by dive guides showed that current strength and temperature were important drivers of the relative abundance of sharks at monitored sites. Our study validates the use of datasets of shark abundance collected by professional dive guides in frequently-visited dive sites in Palau, and supports the participation of experienced recreational divers as contributors to long-term monitoring programs of shark populations.

Highlights

  • Many shark species are experiencing unsustainable rates of mortality due to fishing, a phenomenon that is driving population declines globally [1]

  • Shark relative abundances at Blue Corner and Ulong Channel were higher than at other sites with mean values of 20.360.6 and 19.060.7 per dive respectively, while lower relative abundance was recorded at German Channel with mean value of 11.160.4 sharks per dive (Table 2)

  • Patterns in the relative abundance of grey reef sharks as reported by dive guides and numbers detected by telemetry at the monitored sites followed very similar trends at both daily and monthly scales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many shark species are experiencing unsustainable rates of mortality due to fishing, a phenomenon that is driving population declines globally [1]. In 2014, an assessment of the extinction risk of 1,041 species of elasmobranchs concluded that almost half (487 species) were categorised as ‘‘Data Deficient’’, meaning that a lack of information prevented any firm conclusions being drawn on their population status and trajectories [2] This has occurred at a time when there is increasing evidence of the importance of sharks as top-down regulators of the structure and function of marine ecosystems [3] and recognition of their current and potential value as a non-consumptive resource that supports local economies through ecotourism [4]. The large scale (tens to hundreds of km) and long-term (years to decades) monitoring programs that can be required to document the status of populations are expensive, if they involve inwater activities such as SCUBA diving For this reason, implementing these initiatives is often beyond the means of governments of developing countries or organisations with interests in the conservation of sharks. There is an urgent need for the creation and adoption of simple, standardised and low-cost methods for monitoring shark populations [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call