Abstract
In the existing acoustic emission (AE) localization methods, the estimation localization method based on the time difference of arrival (TDOA) has less computation and higher accuracy of positioning and is easy to implement the real-time systems and thus it becomes a commonly used method in the acoustic source localization methods. In this method, the most important thing is time delay estimation (TDE) that directly affects the accuracy of positioning. In this paper, we analyze the performance of several weighting functions in the generalized cross-correlation time-delay estimation algorithm and give the simulation results. By comparison, PHAT weighting is characterized by small fluctuations, sharp peak and strong anti-jamming ability and it is the best choice for acoustic source localization in the generalized cross-correlation time-delay estimation algorithm.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
